Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 12:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >>> Now I have no problem with pushing such a change into rawhide, but what >>> shall I do about Fedora 15? It doesn't seem very nice to force a soname >>> bump after alpha. On the other hand, the alternatives seem worse: >> IMHO the best solution is to go ahead, bite the bullet, and upgrade F15 >> as well. The two missing bits of info: > From a QA angle, +1 on this, if it helps. I think the long-term pain of > the other options is ultimately worse than the short-term pain of > kicking in the soname change. Yeah, that's the way I'm leaning too. If I haven't heard any convincing objections by this evening, I'll push 5.5.10 into F15 with the soname bump. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
