=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > 2011/3/21 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> Now I have no problem with pushing such a change into rawhide, but what >> shall I do about Fedora 15? It doesn't seem very nice to force a soname >> bump after alpha. On the other hand, the alternatives seem worse: >> >> * never upgrade F15 past mysql 5.5.9 > Not very interesting solution :) I agree, particularly since 5.5.x is still pretty immature --- there are likely to be significant bug fixes coming down the pike. >> * revert F15 to 5.1.x release series > Please _don't_ do this. No, I don't want to do that either. Also, on reflection it would *still* require a recompile to do that, since we hacked some of the exported symbols in the process of reducing libmysqlclient's list of exposed symbols. So that choice seems fairly useless. We might be able to get away with forcing the old soname version to continue being used, but that would mean F15 diverges from pretty much everybody else. On the whole I think a forced recompile of dependent packages might be the best solution, painful as it is. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
