abysmal performance using btrfs for VM storage (was Re: BTRFS vs LVM for VM storage)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-03-02 at 13:49-05 Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > How is BTRFS's performance when used to store VMs (presumably they are
> > stored as files)?
> 
> Good, but the problem is the default behavior of virt manager is to
> use fsync for everything, you have to manually go in and set the
> "Cache" to "None" so it will use O_DIRECT

Doing this will make the Windows XP virtio driver BSOD, though:

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-March/149271.html

> and then it's just as fast as anything else.

Alas, my experience is that btrfs performance when used to store VM
disk images is abysmal to the point of being unusable:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689127

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux