On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, it looks like the second two bits weren't properly cloned/communicated. > Design of this appears to have been 'firstboot maintainer + people CC'd on > the bug.' Okay... > Changing the root password screen wasn't mentioned as part of that > plan; The point is that that in the default flow now, you get both; and there is no plan to change this; correct? > note that that's at an entirely different portion of the workflow, and > given that firstboot does not run on all installs, leads to problems if you > drop it entirely (how do you log in?) Of course, I know why firstboot was created, and we've talked in the past about basically running it inside Anaconda so in the case where you *aren't* booting a pre-imaged system it is saner. But that's not quite the point - it's really not hard to change our software implementation. The hard part is having a plan for what the implementation should be, and that's my above question. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
