On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:54:02 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > lordsawar has a gfdl manual that is installed. Does that need to be reflected > > in the license tag such that it should be GPLv2+ and GFDL1.1+, instead of > > just GPLv2+? > > legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx would be the right place to ask that, > but I'm pretty sure the answer you'll get is "yes". OK. > You could possibly split the manual into a documentation subpackage > with its own License: tag if you wanted to keep the license tags clear. In this case I'd like both to be installed together so it is easier to use help. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
