On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 07:37:56 +0100, Sven wrote: > After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a > huge number of packages. > > I extracted the list from scm-commits emails so I hope that I haven't > missed any. > > The following packages are in need of new owners: > libexif Had a look at libexif-0.6.19 in git although there are dozens of co-maintainers: $ fedpkg unused-patches cve-2007-6351.patch cve-2007-6352.patch libexif-0.6.12-gcc4.patch libexif-0.6.12-odd.patch libexif-0.6.12-recurse.patch libexif-0.6.13-dont-build-docs.patch libexif-0.6.13-mock.patch libexif-cve-2007-4168.patch libexif-integer-overflow.patch olympus-byte-order.patch Why are these patches still around? 0.6.20 is available, btw. The pregenerated docs are from 0.6.15. Is it always necessary to pregenerate doxygen docs because of multiarch conflicts? A Fedora Wiki search finds this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BillNottingham/MultilibDraft Quote: "the horrors of doxygen" Wouldn't some %_isa tag in the doc path make the packaging more convenient? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
