On 03/03/2011 09:03 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 03/03/2011 12:42 PM, Will Woods wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:55 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Hi guys. >>> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not >>> expected behaviour even if it is intentional. Already reported. >> One-line reproducer: >> >> case x"" in x) echo matches x;; x?) echo matches x? but not x;; esac >> >> I notice the bash-4.2 CHANGES file[1] mentions something like this in >> the changes from alpha to beta: >> >> "b. Fixed a bug that caused partially-quoted words that were not >> subject to word splitting to retained quoted NULLs." >> >> Maybe that's not as fixed as they thought? > Yeah, got the following from the bash-bug list that Roman submitted. > Here's a fix. This is very similar to bash42-004. > > Chet > > *** ../bash-4.2-patched/subst.c 2011-02-25 12:03:58.000000000 -0500 > --- subst.c 2011-03-03 14:08:23.000000000 -0500 > *************** > *** 4609,4614 **** > --- 4611,4617 ---- > if (ifs_firstc == 0) > #endif > word->flags |= W_NOSPLIT; > + word->flags |= W_NOSPLIT2; > result = call_expand_word_internal (word, quoted, 0, (int *)NULL, > (int *)NULL); > expand_no_split_dollar_star = 0; > > So I presume it'll make its way into a newer bash eventually?? Not sure > on the process but it looks like the powers that be recognize and have a > fix for it. Yep, this patch is from upstream. I will apply it soon. You can track the issue in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681940 RR -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
