On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:23:59 +0000 "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it possible to get the rationality behind why those services which > are permitted to be enabled by default as specific exceptions are > granted that exception. Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login and be able to apply updates, etc" At least that was my thought. I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define these. Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by default. If it is, it _may_ start by default" Just a thought. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
