2011/2/25 Garrett Holmstrom <gholms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > While I can see how this might make things a bit easier, it can obscure > what commits are Fedora-specific as they are lost in the sea of the > upstream kernel's commits, making me firmly against the proposal. Using topgit to control the Fedora patches would be an option, essentially creating a topic branch for each of these patches (and recording their dependencies). I have no clue however if that scales well to ~90 patches. -- Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny@xxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
