On 2/25/11 2:54 AM, MatÄj Cepl wrote: > Dne 24.2.2011 20:54, Ric Wheeler napsal(a): >> Can we have pointers to these crashes or BZ reports please? As Josef has >> noted, btrfs has been quite stable in our testing and we are certainly >> going to pursue any reports. > > Will do ... I am hesitant to do so, because so many of my previous bug > reports didn't make much difference, Do you have pointers to those? Were they on the kernel.org bugzilla, or the red hat bugzilla, the list, or elsewhere? Thanks, -Eric > and given fsck core dumping (for > the last three years), it seems to me that BTRFS is just nothing I would > take seriously. Yet. > >> Just to answer your last question, we do not intend to "slow it down". >> Rather, we hope to speed it up considerably by adding developers, >> testing and users :) > > I meant obviously slowing down accepting BTRFS as default filesystem for > Fedora and throwing away LVM from default, not development of BTRFS itself. > > MatÄj > > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
