Hello, I'v just been bitten by nasm-2.09 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678818) that changed a derivation of __OUTPUT__FORMAT__ macro derivation from `-f FORMAT' option (http://www.nasm.us/doc/nasmdocc.html). If your package uses nasm and conditionalizes some assembly code by %ifidn __OUTPUT_FORMAT__,elf %endif statement, resulting binary will not be what you would expect. Backward nasm and yasm compatible solution is to change the `elf' value to `elf32' or `elf64' (depending on target architecture) in the macro test _and_ at the `-f elf' nasm option. nasm-2.09 has been introduced in Fedora 14 while beeing rawhide. Following listing of F14 SRPM shows some victims: $ repoquery --repoid=fedora-source --repoid=updates-source \ --repoid=updates-testing-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'nasm' nasm-0:2.09.03-2.fc14.src libjpeg-turbo-0:1.0.1-1.fc14.1.src quake3-0:1.36-7.svn1783.fc14.src quake3-0:1.36-8.svn1802.fc14.src syslinux-0:4.02-3.fc14.src tigervnc-0:1.0.90-0.22.20100813svn4123.fc14.src tigervnc-0:1.0.90-0.24.20100813svn4123.fc14.src As you can see SDL is missing there for unknown reason. Maybe because the nasm BuildRequires is conditionalized by architecture. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
