Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:58:25PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 03:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > "May" as in "Are allowed to". It's always going to be the package
> > maintainers call in the end - we're not going to mandate it.
> >
> 
> Hum not following you..
> 
> If ultimately packagers can override this then is this [1] being worked on?
> 
> I thought the whole purpose was to allow "exceptions" that should be 
> turned on by default but everything else should be off at install time?

Yes. A package's presence on the exception list does not preclude a 
maintainer from defaulting it to off.

> But I think Colin is right everything should default to off then each 
> SIG document on their wiki page what service they have turned "on" in 
> their kickstart file and why.

Fedora is intended to be a functional distribution, not merely a toolbox 
for SIGs to build functional distributions.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux