On Wed, 23.02.11 11:41, Jon Masters (jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > You seem to spend a lot of time during your installs undoing all the > > new things that were done for the release. Perhaps a rapid changing, > > bleeding-edge distribution isn't quite suited to your needs. Maybe > > you would be more comfortable with Debian or CentOS? > > I'll bite. I am, indeed, a fan of various Enterprise Linux distributions > and I make no pretense that I am not. I do run an Enterprise Linux on > one desktop, and it's also true that I intentionally run my primary > desktop several Fedora releases behind so as to avoid many of the > problems I see from some of these changes. However, I also run more > recent Fedora releases, and on those releases, I typically have to undo > changes such as the one originally being proposed (replacing LVM). > > Again, I feel the solution is to have a Fedora architect whose role is > to realize the problems caused by seemingly isolated changes, and stop > them from propagating. You don't just replace years of UNIX (or Linux) > history/heritage overnight without bothering a chunk of the users. We have that already. It's called FESCO, and is pluralistic and democratic and stuff. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
