Re: Plans for BTRFS in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/2/22 Jóhann B. <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> So what are your thoughts?  Thanks,
>
> Will there be any performance penalties making this move?
>

Who knows, thats what testing is for :).  There are some things that
suck with BTRFS, but so it goes with filesystems.

> I ran it on my workstation when F13 came out with updates+snapshots and while updating my desktop responsiveness was well not so good.
>
> Novice end users tools ( GUI ) and policy to clean those snapshots and perhaps storing those snapshots in it's own directory and or partition rather than directly on / need be in place before we implement this as an default.
>

They would be helpful, but not necessary.

> I suggest people try it during the F15 atleast those that are considering as an default to catch any potential usability issues it did not eat any babes from me when I ran it.
>
> I think we should also ask ourselves these questions..
>
> What benefit will this switch bring to the novice desktop end users?
>

Various things, better data integrity to start with, and if you
install the yum-fs-snapshot you have the ability to rollback easily.

> Will the novice desktop end user ever take advantages of any of the features that btrfs brings?
>

At the very least you get better data integrity via our checksumming
and duplicate metadata on single spindle fs's.  Thanks,

Josef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux