On 02/22/2011 10:45 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:57:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On a more abstract level one may consider perl's META.yml-machinery to >> be a package dependency tracking machinery of its own, in parallel to >> rpm's dependency tracking machinery, with the essentially the same >> issues, problems and imperfections as rpm/rpm.specs itself. > > In such case aren't such missing dependencies a normal upstream bug which > should be fixed first as a Fedora patch (of META.yml) and pushed upstream, > as usual? > > > Thanks, > Jan Great idea, you can start with your package... Seriously, it's hundred of packages, you can hardly fix all of them and you can't be sure that there won't be any missing requires during updates. It would be nice if we have possibility to check it automatically. Rpm changed few things and it's now finding more requires. That's a start ;-) But it shouldn't happened few days before freeze. Regards, Marcela -- Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà BaseOS team Brno -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
