On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 15:17 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2011/02/17 11:57 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed: > > > On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 13:10 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > > >> FYI, I built and pushed biosdevname 0.3.7 with the recent bugfixes and > >> behavioral fixes. I wanted to get this out for testing in the F15 > >> Alpha cut. To that end, I need 3 people to give +1 karma to the > >> update > > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/biosdevname-0.3.7-1.fc15 > > > Since the Alpha is frozen, you also need there to be a bug against > > biosdevname which is accepted as a blocker or nice-to-have for the > > Alpha. I may be missing something, but at a quick glance I don't see any > > such... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675048 wouldn't qualify as such? It's not a question of whether it would qualify if proposed - just that none had been proposed at the time I sent that mail :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
