Re: boost 1.46.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 11:05 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> 04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote:
> > I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
> > sure that the new boost works.  If that turns out well, I'll do a
> > non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today.
> 
> The packages that I tried built OK, so I'm calling this good enough, and 
> spinning an official build now.  The list of ABI dependences is here. 
> These packages really really need to be rebuilt, otherwise they'll stop 
> working (soname bump on boost side) after the new boost gets into the 
> build root.  I can't rebuild other people's packages, so I can't do any 
> of this myself.

It would probably be a good idea to apply for provenpackager status
then. IMHO, being the maintainer of a component on which multiple other
packages depend is a pretty good justification for being a
provenpackager.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux