Re: mass rebuild status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 11:49 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Dennis Gilmore<dennis@xxxxxxxx> Âwrote:
>>>
>>> asterisk
>>
>> This one should be taken care of now. ÂI suspect that something in
>> F15/rawhide changed that made Asterisk's build system think that an
>> optional dependency was now a mandatory one.
>
>
> Yeah, the new rpm changed something with the way perl requires were
> generated. ÂIt broke a few other things, too.

Actually it's not rpm-related, the Asterisk actually has a custom
C-based dependency checker and I wonder if something in gcc changed
and broke it.  I haven't had a chance to do much debugging except to
figure out a workaround.

-- 
Jeff Ollie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux