On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:35:37 -0500 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > <nod> ÂThat does a great job of explaining what we had here. ÂThe > > difference this time is that instead of architecture being the key, > > version of xz was the key. ÂThe new and old versions of xz create > > compatible archives but they aren't byte-for-byte identical. ÂThat > > could lead to certain circumstances where the rpm signature was > > invalid for an rpm reconstructed from a deltarpm even though the > > uncompressed data was the same. > > I updated the wiki page a bit. Thank you Josh. It's appreciated. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
