On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 07:00:44 pm Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > so the mass rebuild is 24 hours in we have completed ~45% of the builds > > and are at 365 packages failed to build the total number of builds in > > the mass rebuild is 10404 we are churning along nicely. i expect to > > complete the first pass sometime in the next 24 hours. so far i think > > its going pretty well > > > > some web pages to look at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html and > > http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html these 2 pages are updated ~ > > every 10 minutes. Please drop into #fedora-devel on freenode if you have > > any questions. > > I believe this wiki page should have been included in the announce mail: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild > > For those that don't particularly follow devel day-to-day, the blurb > about the XZ change is pretty uninformative. I've tried to dig back a > bit and it seems the XZ change is to pick up XZ 5.0. It seems the > rebuild was done to fix Delta RPM generation? From a package > standpoint, will that mean that F14 is incapable of reading F15 RPMs? > Does that impact mock? > > I'd be happy to flesh out the change a bit more in detail if someone > could point me at what is really changing in terms of XZ compression > and what it means going forward. Better late than never. > > josh im able to init a rawhide chroot on F14, so the xz compression format is supported. its a incompatiable change. what would have been broken is deltarpm creation if the original and update use different compression we cant generate deltarpms. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
