I recently came across an issue in a package review where I would appreciate guidance. In particular, I have never dealt with Haskell packages before, and I haven't been able to find enough detail in the Haskell Packaging Guidelines to answer my questions: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Haskell It seems that there's a tool called cabal2spec that autogenerates spec files for Haskell programs. However, the spec files that it outputs are a little unusual. The spec file I'm reviewing has no %package sections and no %files sections. Instead, there is a reference to a "%{?ghc_lib_package}" macro that implicitly defines the package and two subpackages. The Haskell Packaging Guidelines don't seem to describe how all of the magic works, so I'm not quite sure what standards I'm supposed to use in my review. Here's a link to the package request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662258 It looks like other Haskell libraries are packaged in a similar way, but it's enough different from most packages that the Package Review Guidelines don't seem to cleanly apply. I would appreciate advice on how to proceed. Thanks. -- Andrew McNabb http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/ PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
