Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 01/27/2011 09:51 PM +9:00: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Yes, perl was broken. I have untagged it and notified the maintainer >> (who was already looking at it). >> >> Things should work again as soon as the buildroot rebuilds. > > So is Perl still broken? I'm getting lots of emails like: > > vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl > vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires perl(strict) > > Rich. > I received mails about broken deps not only on perl, like: On i386: mfiler3-4.2.1-1.fc15.i686 requires saphire >= 0:1.1.8 mfiler3-4.2.1-1.fc15.i686 requires libsaphire.so.1 On i386: rubygem-mechanize-1.0.1-0.1.beta.20110107104205.fc15.noarch requires rubygem(net-http-persistent) So currently I guess this is not perl problem but repoclosure is broken in some way (I don't know well) Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
