Bill Nottingham wrote: > Am I missing something, or would this [*] also be binary-incompatible? If > so, that's very very very much not worth the effort. +1 I don't think having another Fedora build for x86_64 machines is worth the effort. (And it definitely doesn't make sense to replace the true 64-bit build with this. Some people need true 64-bit.) Kevin Kofler [*] the x86_32 ABI on the x86_64 ISA -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel