Re: New test case and package test plan creation SOPs in production: call for test cases!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 18:06 +0000, Petr Pisar wrote:
> In the how-to for categorization
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_package_test_plan_creation#Categorization>
> is prescribed category name format `Category:Package_(packagename)_test_cases'. However every existing test or category uses
> `Category:(packagename)_test_cases'. E.g.
> <https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:TestCase_ABRT_BlackList&action=edit>.
> 
> Which schema is correct?

The one in the SOP. The ones you see are ones that have existed for a
long time - there's never been a formal system until now, it's just
fairly logical to pick a category name '(something)_test_cases', so lots
of people did, and it looks kind of standardized, but really it never
was. (often it's not actually 'packagename' in the existing category
names, but a feature name which isn't actually the .src.rpm name, or
something like that).

The existing test cases that are actually package test cases will be
converted to the new naming scheme, I'm going to make a start on this
soon.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux