On 12/31/2010 06:27 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:06:55 +0100, Christoph wrote: > >> 2010/12/31 Michael Schwendt: >>> Just for clarity, which "recent builds" are that? >> >> Recent means obviously those carrying an fc15 tag. > > That isn't anything like obvious, because development of Fedora 15 > has started _months_ ago, and the ".fc15" dist tag has been used for > several months already. Hence I wanted to know whether "recent" might > refer to builds done in the last week or the last days. > >> No package later >> than those built for F11 should be of type i386 at all. ~ C > > This is wrong. I disagree. > It is still possible to alter the default buildarch. Correct ... but this does not mean this is right nor does this mean this is useful. > Here's a list of the i386 packages in Rawhide (cannot use repoquery here atm): > > $ html2text Index\ of\ _pub_fedora_linux_development_rawhide_i386_os_Packages.html|grep i386.rpm > [[ ]] chealpix-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 10:14 24K > [[ ]] chealpix-devel-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:10 9.6K > [[ ]] elilo-3.6-9.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:48 222K > [[ ]] frysk-0.4-28.fc15.i386.rpm 28-Sep-2010 10:34 23M > [[ ]] frysk-devel-0.4-28.fc15.i386.rpm 28-Sep-2010 10:36 4.0M > [[ ]] frysk-gnome-0.4-28.fc15.i386.rpm 28-Sep-2010 10:36 4.1M > [[ ]] gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:31 160K > [[ ]] gpicview-0.2.1-3.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 10:22 93K > [[ ]] healpix-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:53 8.6M > [[ ]] healpix-c++-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:35 322K > [[ ]] healpix-c++-devel-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:59 63K > [[ ]] healpix-devel-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:49 59K > [[ ]] jnettop-0.13.0-8.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:54 49K > [[ ]] kBuild-0.1.5-6.p2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:52 598K > [[ ]] libvncserver-0.9.7-4.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:27 153K > [[ ]] libvncserver-devel-0.9.7-4.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:59 45K > [[ ]] parcellite-0.9.2-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:32 56K > [[ ]] readline-6.1-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:14 181K > [[ ]] readline-devel-6.1-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 10:04 137K > [[ ]] readline-static-6.1-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:16 112K > [[ ]] tomcat-native-1.1.20-1.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:23 57K > [[ ]] tunneler-1.1.1-6.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:24 36K > [[ ]] xfce4-dict-0.6.0-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:45 112K > [[ ]] xfce4-dict-plugin-0.6.0-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:54 51K > [[ ]] xfce4-diskperf-plugin-2.2.0-6.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:58 35K > [[ ]] xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-1.1.0-5.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:03 355K Now, somebody please explain why these packages use i386 and shall not be considered "broken" - IMO, these packages all are broken. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
