On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 15:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > From a quick glance over this looks good to me, and I would be happy to > start trying to make test cases. A few random things: > > * Would it be worth noting that anyone can make a test case, it doesn't > need to be the maintainer, right? Indeed - I kind of left this assumed, I'm not sure it's entirely appropriate for an SOP doc, but it wouldn't really hurt to add it. > * Also, might be worth noting that if you run into a specific bug as a > maintainer and fix it, thats a great time to go add a test case to > specifically test that (since it's fresh in your mind). interesting, I'll add it to the draft and see how it looks... > * finally, it's ok to just start in on some tests and add them over > time, right? We don't want to care if a package has incomplete > coverage right off the bat right? definitely, yes. some tests always beats no tests. do you think the current pages don't make that sufficiently clear? > Yeah, tough one. Not sure how best to handle that. Perhaps just a > 'Dependencies:' type header asking you to make sure you test dependent > packages and see their test cases? it's possible but feels hackish and likely to go crufty... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
