On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 11:04 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100 > Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using > > them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package > > ownership. > > > > In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL > > package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/rt3 > > > > The person has been active in koji a day ago. > > Yeah. ;( > > I wish we could more easily target the epel owner(s) of a package. > Especially in such cases where the Fedora maintainer isn't interested > and doesn't have anything to do with the epel branches. > > Perhaps we could look at implementing a > > $packagename-epel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > alias for just the epel branches for a package? > > I'll look into that. > should be pretty trivial to implement. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
