On 12/13/2010 02:17 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 12/13/2010 01:14 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:24:15 pm Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >>> On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >>>>> so, can we call the RFE: "attach backtrace even when dupe is found" ? >>>> >>>> or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if current >>>> backtrace is better than any already attached to the bug*'. >>> >>> Adam, that would require downloading all the bt from the bugzilla to the >>> user and do some comparing on his side (this would be nice to have in >>> bz) ... but it is doable... >> >> Inspire from Dr. Konqui again ;-) They have very nice system to pre-detect >> possible dups in bz, you can compare your backtraces, set if it's a duplicate >> for sure or it's possible duplicate etc. It really works! At least for a little >> bit advanced users - it filtered 90% of reports of my crashes ;-) >> >> R. > > - AFAIK it's implemented server side ... so nothing ABRT can do... we > have tools to find possible dupes client side, but it takes few hours to > download all the backtraces from bz to compare it... > - but yes, it would be nice to have such feature in our bz... > btw, kklic is working on those scripts to make them more user friendly and will make them available - especially triaggers might find them useful... J. >> >>> J. >> > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
