On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:11:27AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > > > > > The problem here is that some maintainers doesn't want ABRT reports at > > > all even those not yet reported... > > > > It's arguable that such people are 'maintainers' at all if this is the > > case. I find it quite sad that we have packagers who don't care about the > > quality of what they are packaging beyond the specfile. > > â says the maintainer of the one package in Fedora for which ABRT reports > the bugs directly upstream. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but there's a pretty big difference between completely ignoring automatically filed bugs (regardless of where they're filed), and automatically filing those bugs upstream. Apropos of nothing: kerneloops reporting seems to have been broken ever since we switched from using the kerneloops client to abrt, but that's another story.. Dave -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
