Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 01:44:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Last built on Fedora 12 (52):
> 
> Huh?
> 
> The right metric is not "when was this last built" but "when was this last 
> BUILDABLE". We don't randomly rebuild stuff which doesn't need to be 
> rebuilt.
> 
> E.g.:
> > celestia-1.5.1-2.fc12 [u'631077 NEW'] (build/make) steve,mmahut
> (the first one on that list) is in F14FTBFS, so it should be recorded as 
> last buildable in F13 / during early F14 development.

Fair point, I simply looked at the dist tag when making that list,
instead of looking at the decendents of F*FTBFS which captures the
"when" better.  Doesn't change that I'd like to seem them all fixed if
possible (and several have been since I posted the list), or dropped if
impossible (and a few have been blocked by their owners now as being
dead upstream, unfixable, and/or obsoleted).

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | Office of the CTO
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux