On Sun, 2 May 2004, ByteEnable wrote: > > Which .la files? Whatever library it is that actually needed libselinux > > should probably get a dependency added in its -devel subpackage. > > > > Jeremy > > libfam.la > librpmbuild.la > librpm.la I would argue that a better fix would be to modify the packages above to strip all references of libselinux from their .la files or possibly remove the .la files altogether (if they're not absolutely needed) -- Rex
