On 12/09/2010 07:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > >>> 2) I really dislike that "local trace generation" and "retrace server" >>> are discussed as though they're the only options. If nothing else, for >>> many non-trivial apps where abrt is potentially of the most use the core >>> you're uploading can easily be hundreds of megabytes; that's not really >>> better than downloading hundreds of megabytes. A network debuginfo >>> service [1] would approach this problem in a completely different way, >>> by letting the client download exactly as much debuginfo as it needs. >>> >> >> I mentioned the debuginfofs many times in ABRT flames, there was however >> a problem with our debug tools making it unusable, because one had to >> read the whole debuginfo file from the server and few other problems so >> that's why the retrace server idea came up. but this should fixed in the >> current tools so theoretically nothing prevents us from reviving it.. >> once this is done ABRT can easily use it... > > I have trouble following what you're saying here. At what point does > one need to "read the whole debuginfo file"? > I'm referring to this: https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/crash-catcher/2010-September/000965.html Jirka -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
