Once upon a time Sunday 02 May 2004 9:51 pm, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 08:38, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Once upon a time Sunday 02 May 2004 3:29 pm, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > So, the package that comes down to breaking is newpg, correct?
>
> Yes.
>
> > ill work on a libgcrypt1 package in the intrim solution. using gnupg2
> > would reslove most if not all of the problems
>
> As long as gnupg2 (when it's time) will have "Obsoletes: newpg", I
> believe we can find a clean solution by packaging libgcrypt1 and
> changing gpgme and gpgme03 to require %{_bindir}/gpgsm instead of newpg.
should we just package a gnupg2 package now? can it be done cleanly to have 2
versions of gnupg on the system at once? we will need to file a bug against
gnupg i guess to try and make sure that when it gets to gnupg2 that we have
the Obsoletes: newpg in it.
Dennis
