Perhaps the issue is that the coding of the priority isn't intuitive. I thought -20 was 'highest priority' and high numbers were 'lower priority' Would something more meaningful and unambiguous be better? -Cam On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> said: >> I noticed that this service uses insane nice level -19 >> http://notendur.hi.is/~johannbg/systemd/etc/rc.d/init.d/mailgraph >> 8-| >> >> PRIORITY=-19 >> [..] >>   daemon nice $PRIORITY $exe -l $MAILLOG -d \ >>     --daemon-pid=/var/run/mailgraph.pid  \ >>     --daemon-rrd=/var/lib/mailgraph $OPTIONS >> >> The same priority is used in the sample script. Does this service >> _really_ needs such insane nice level? > > Why do you (repeatedly) call it "insane"? ÂThat's kind of rude. ÂThe > process is running at a low priority level; do you have a problem with > that? > > -- > Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
