On 12/07/2010 11:52 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:20:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a >> question. >> >> Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per >> Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there >> real value in ACLs for f13, f14, devel, etc...? > > There should be at least a distinction between EOL releases and non EOL > releases, e.g. someone having only commit access for F12 must not have > commit access for F13+ currently, because usually only ownership / ACLs > for current Fedora releases are up to date in PackageDB. I don't think the above really means we need different ACLs per branch, just that if we did flatten then we need to flatten them as a union of current active branches and not any EOL data. > And there > should still be a distinction in PackageDB for different > (co)maintainer for different Fedora releases. For what reason? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
