On 12/07/2010 10:25 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a >> question. >> >> Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per >> Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there >> real value in ACLs for f13, f14, devel, etc...? > > > I'm not sure there is. I'd like an on ramp to recruit yet to be > sponsored contributors into helping out by allowing them to patch the > packaging without build or bodhi rights...give me the ability to > review their work and do the builds. But I don't need that on a per > branch level. > > -jef That can be accomplished by having them do an anonymous clone, commit their changes locally, and send you the changes via git send-email. If you like them, you can git am the emails and the changes will appear in the repo as authored and with the changelog of the potential contributor. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
