On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:13:49PM -0600, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > On 12/6/2010 23:01, Matt Domsch wrote: > > I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose > > point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. The > > lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3 > > exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in NEW state as well, so they > > haven't had much maintainer love in quite some time (6-18 months). > > Is the policy we already have for this [1] insufficient or merely > unenforced? > > [1] > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source#Package_Removal_for_Long-standing_FTBFS_bugs Unenforced at F14 alpha stage, and it requires someone preparing a candidate list to drop well ahead of the alpha stage, to give people fair warning. That's what I'm doing here. :-) -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
