On Sat, 1 May 2004, Matthew Miller wrote: >On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:50:59PM -0700, Per Bjornsson wrote: >> If the answer is "no", is it because of perceived destabilization or >> because it takes time from new development? If it is the latter, would >> it be possible for volunteer-packaged updates to be considered for >> inclusion as official updates? (I believe that the FC2 Gnome is very >> close to upstream, so it's likely that very little patch updating etc >> would have to be done - is that a correct assumption? I can see that for >> heavily patched packages would be more difficult for someone who is not >> the original packager to package a sane update.) > >I think it's a bad idea to go down that road. Whole new Fedora Core releases >are planned to be quite frequent; within each one, the packages should be as >stable as possible. I think that people who want 2.6.1 can make the packages and put them in fedora.us for cooking. -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --
