Re: Help to solve a possible circular Requires:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:24 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am seeking some help here to solve a possible $subject. I have been
> trying to find a simple alternate solution, but I just canÂt see it or
> itÂs not obvious to me.
> 
> This is the situation:
> 
> srpm foo 1.0 ships 2 rpmÂs bar and baz. bar has a daemon inside.
> 
> due to upstream split:
> 
> srpm foo 1.1 now ships only bar rpm without the daemon.
> 
> srpm baz 1.1 now ships 2 rpmÂs, baz (exactly as in version 1.0) and
> baz-something that contains the barÂs daemon from 1.0.
> 
> In order to avoid upgrade issues, we need to make sure that bar 1.1 will
> pull in baz-something 1.1 (to retain functionality), at the same time
> baz-something requires bar 1.1 to operate at all.
> 
> There is no requirement for a strictly versioned Requires: on both
> sides. baz-something Requires: bar >= 1.1, and bar Requires:
> baz-something (no version need since itÂs a new rpm).

 The above reads more complicated than I think it is. I assume you have
two problems:

1. When moving from foo-1.0 => foo-1.1 and baz-1.1, you have a package
split ... this implies using versioned Obsoletes (<= 1.0) on bar from
baz-something.

2. In baz-something-1.1 you have a normal requires on bar-1.1 ... so
just add a versioned (>= 1.1) require.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux