Re: Unresponsive maintainer for libical

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I know I'm not following the NonResponsiveMaintainer policy closely, but
> I believe, in this particular case, it would be with no gain.
>
> I'm fine to take ownership of the libical package and do releases for
> it.

I am orphaning it in PackageDB. Please take up ownership.

Thanks,
Debarshi


-- 
The camera is to the brush what Java is to assembly.
 Â-- Sougata Santra
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux