On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:25:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 14:10 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > > That being the case, I test the package fairly rigorously myself. But > > this process doesn't take that into account. I test far more things > > than you get with a few people just doing smoke tests, but the smoke > > tests are actually the gating factor. If you changed the process so a > > maintainer can indicate they've done their own fairly extensive testing, > > that would satisfy me. But that also opens the door for abuse, so you > > would have to watch maintainers once you enabled this ability. > > I've posted in the thread earlier that I'd actually like to do this, > others seem opposed however. > FWIW I'm for it with your explanation and added it to the Update brainstorming page last night: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Changes_Ideas_Container -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpn0WT30RiOb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
