On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 19:19 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > A big difference is that the testing process is very fuzzy and there is > not much tooling that helps people to test unknown software. E.g. if I > want to review a package, there are several checklists I could use and > there are guidelines that I can easily follow to perform a review. But > testing software is not that easy. That's one thing we'll be working on this cycle. > Also it is not possible to partly test updates and share the effort. > E.g. in reviews everyone can comment to get the package in shape if it > is not. Non-numeric Bodhi feedback will help with that. (Luke, in case you didn't get the hint yet...we really need that non-numeric Bodhi feedback :>) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
