Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Havoc Pennington <hp@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> A possibly related discussion; we've been wondering if we can make the
> OS image read-only (mounting it that way, or via selinux).

I run with /usr read-only already, and if I didn't have users in
/etc/passwd I could mount / read-only.

> Then have /tmp and probably /var in RAM (or wiped on boot), and have
> home directories and server/app data such as web pages to be served on
> network mounts.

/var needs to continue across reboots, as that is where logs are (and
not everything can do network logging, nor do you want to log to an NFS
mount).  I don't see you being able to get away from having some local
writable storage.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux