On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of > > this policy. > > > Evidently my update was approved somewhere along the way, but because of > > the volume of bodhi spam I get, I missed it. > > ...so what you're saying is that F14 did not in fact go out with a > broken mdadm *purely* because of the policy, but in a small part because > of the policy and in a large part because you don't read / filter your > emails carefully enough. > > > So I'm not sure if it > > could have made F14 final or not, but I know it didn't because I was > > working on other things at the time. > > bodhi - 2010-10-14 22:36:08 > Critical path update approved > > The final change deadline was 10-18; you had four days to push the > update. Also, if karma automatism was enabled for that update, it would have been queued for pushing right when it was approved. luke -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
