On 12/01/2010 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Because it's not so almighty. In BSD-land, including Solaris, the devices > are named after the driver, so you get /dev/sis0 and /dev/bge1 and > /dev/e1000g0 and whatnot. > That BSD scheme suffers the same pitfalls as the current fedora scheme - change hardware and if its not same driver your firewall breaks. I like the biosdevname approach better - at least if I understand it correctly. gene -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
