On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:34 +0000, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > > have no problems with it and I maintain around 120 packages. Filter it > > if you don't like it. > > Are you interrested in such notifications? Discussion about filtering/blocking mentioned messages is about how to fix consequence but... The discussion should search for improving source of the problem. What about source of this? I could count e.g.: - missing reaction of QA - missing approval for the package to be moved to stable - missing additional action of developer I've got a lot messages due to one package (needs modem for testing). I contacted some concerned people directly and I'm glad to say this situation has no more repeated with this package. This works fine. I believe only a little portion of packages are related to this problem. Well, I'm convinced better is "ask for action" then to discuss what "should/shouldn't happen". Skalnik -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
