Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mar, 30/03/2004 Ã 15:15 -0800, Shahms King a Ãcrit :

> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 14:57, seth vidal wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >  looking at fhs 2.3 and thinking about what needs to be done for fc3 -
> > just a few things that people could get working on early:
> > 
> > /srv - user data for services not owned by a single specific user there
> > ie:
> >    /srv/www
> >    /srv/vsftpd
> >    /srv/postgresql ?
> >    /srv/mysql ?
> >    /srv/jabberd ?
> >    /srv/bittorrent ?
> 
> So . . . remind me how this is different (fundamentally) from /var ?

Well, speaking as a sysadmin here the size and integrity constraints
of /srv are very different from /var. Most of the stuff listed here ends
up in different partitions than /var usually, since your typical /var is
rarely sized to host the 50 GiB ftp server people might want to install
a year from now.

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux