seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > I talked to bill nottingham about it - he didn't seem opposed to /srv > but a bit annoyed by /media > > I don't think it matters fhs compliance is a must, imo. /srv - well, there's no real *other* good place for this stuff, so, go for it. /media, though, as a standard, is *completely* wrongheaded. Standardizing device names and mountpoints, when they should be left up to sysadmin discretion. Moreover, it doesn't even completely standardize them; there's holes in the naming. And, in any case, all of this information should be exposed to user space via names created by udev, and by a library interface such as HAL; not by a standard that's always going to be playing catchup with new device types. Bill
