On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:03:41 +0100, Ralf wrote: > On 11/24/2010 10:45 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > > Dne 24.11.2010 03:28, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > >> No, it's not your fault (Or at least only partially). A functional QA > >> would catch such kind of breakages. > > > > Yes, but functional QA would require more manpower than Fedora QA > > currently has. > > That's one perspective. > > Another one is: The approach having been taken is > non-feasible/impractiable/unsuiteable. True. The appropriate action now would be to move the openldap package onto a special QA list, which restricts the update acceptance criteria further, so the openldap-servers must be tested, too. Especially if the updates trigger database maintenance jobs. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
