Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:04, seth vidal wrote:
> I don't think talking about whether or not we like them is useful here.
> It is the fhs and fedora core should be compliant with it.

There are plenty of standards out there that are just silly, so
compliance for the sake of compliance is probably not the best
approach.  

Note: I'm not arguing one way or another on this one, just saying that
using the argument of "it's a standard" is somewhat weak.

Jeremy



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux